'Ads Are The New Tip Jar' - By Seth Godin
-
Seth Godin is one of the most famous bloggers around and has authored
numerous books on the subject of marketing.
I just ran into this old post of his, 'A...
1 week ago


4 comments:
It would be best to have date range for each of the criteria. For example, date range for program enrollment, another date range for "On ARV", and another date range for "Lost To Followup".
Interesting. What is the query you're trying to ask if we add date ranges for ON ARV and LOST TO FOLLOWUP?
Sometimes, we use different definitions for "On ARVs" and "Lost to Followup". Let's use Lost to Followup as an example. Our Outreach definition is that on ARVs patients who have no encounter for over 6 months and NOT on ARVs patients who have no encounter for over 12 months. Our research definition is that on ARVs patients who have no encounter for over 3 months and NOT on ARVs patients who have no encounter for over 6 months. That's why I thought having date range for each criteria would be more flexible.
So hopefully, that will actually be built into the definition for LOST TO FOLLOWUP. In other words, when you click on LOST TO FOLLOW, you will triggering a cohort definition or logic query to fire. To keep the UI as simple as possible, we'll default to "today" as the date to calculate 6 MONTHS or 3 MONTHS. But when the user drills into the next page (Cohort Analysis), they'll be able to play around with the criteria in a more fine-grained way.
Post a Comment